--On June 24, 2006 11:01:58 AM +0000 John Levine <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com>
wrote:
1296: user(_at_)sub(_dot_)example(_dot_)com vs. user(_at_)example(_dot_)com
This is John Levine's version of what basically is the same as
1292. Let's see if John likes the answer to 1292 for this too.
1296: CLOSE, see resolution for 1292 -- subject to confirmation
with JohnL.
I don't see the point of a flag that will always be set the same
way, but I can live with it.
John, I think one of us must be missing something. Why would the
flag always be set the same? The problem only occurs when you are
using g= in the key, and there might be good reason why you would not
want to limit the signature to the d= domain in this case, e.g.,
role-based names such as perhaps "postmaster".
eric
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html