[ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?

ietf-dkim

[ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?

2006-07-01 15:38:31


3.6.1, "s=". Given that new tags can be added to key records
without affecting compliant implementations, I don't see why this
is needed now and suggest deleting it.


_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?, Stephen Farrell <= Re: [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?, Paul Hoffman Re: [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?, Stephen Farrell

Previous by Date:	[ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell
Next by Date:	[ietf-dkim] section 5 rewrite?, Stephen Farrell
Previous by Thread:	[ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?, Paul Hoffman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]