IETF DKIM (date)
July 31, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Scott Kitterman, 20:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hector Santos, 19:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Steve Atkins, 19:37
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Bill.Oxley, 19:37
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM Signature Authorization Protocol (DSAP), Hector Santos, 19:34
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, John L, 19:19
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Bill.Oxley, 18:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, John Levine, 18:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?, Hector Santos, 13:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Hector Santos, 13:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible Signing Practices non-technical terminology, william(at)elan.net, 13:09
- [ietf-dkim] Possible Signing Practices non-technical terminology, Dave Crocker, 12:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Dave Crocker, 12:51
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:45
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, John L, 12:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Dave Crocker, 12:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Dave Crocker, 12:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, william(at)elan.net, 12:34
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Tony Hansen, 12:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?, Hector Santos, 11:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Dave Crocker, 10:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Mark Delany, 10:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Scott Kitterman, 10:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found..., Arvel Hathcock, 10:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Hector Santos, 10:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Hector Santos, 10:11
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on asuccessfulverify?, Bill.Oxley, 10:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, wayne, 09:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Arvel Hathcock, 09:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Dave Crocker, 09:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Arvel Hathcock, 09:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?, Mark Delany, 09:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, John Levine, 08:52
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successfulverify?, Bill.Oxley, 08:43
- [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Mark Delany, 08:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Mark Delany, 08:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Scott Kitterman, 08:14
- [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, John L, 07:18
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, John L, 07:14
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Bill.Oxley, 07:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, John L, 07:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, william(at)elan.net, 07:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found..., Stephen Farrell, 07:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, John L, 07:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found..., william(at)elan.net, 06:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, william(at)elan.net, 06:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found..., Arvel Hathcock, 06:09
July 30, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., Michael Thomas, 16:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Michael Thomas, 16:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Michael Thomas, 16:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Michael Thomas, 16:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Hector Santos, 13:28
- [ietf-dkim] Summarizing the small/non-technical domain owner scenario, Scott Kitterman, 13:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] scenarios, Mark Delany, 12:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] scenarios, Hector Santos, 12:21
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Dave Crocker, 09:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] scenarios, Mark Delany, 09:40
- RE: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Bill.Oxley, 09:39
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Stephen Farrell, 09:28
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Dave Crocker, 09:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., Stephen Farrell, 09:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., Dave Crocker, 09:11
- [ietf-dkim] scenarios, Dave Crocker, 09:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Dave Crocker, 08:55
July 29, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Jim Fenton, 20:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Hector Santos, 20:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Dave Crocker, 16:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reflector update, Dave Crocker, 09:29
- [ietf-dkim] Reflector update, Arvel Hathcock, 09:13
July 28, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Jim Fenton, 16:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., william(at)elan.net, 15:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found..., Dave Crocker, 15:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found..., Mark Delany, 15:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Jon Callas, 15:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Jon Callas, 14:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found..., Jim Fenton, 14:50
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:43
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 12:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, John L, 12:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Dave Crocker, 12:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found..., Dave Crocker, 12:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, John L, 12:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Douglas Otis, 12:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Douglas Otis, 11:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Jim Fenton, 11:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, John Levine, 11:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., John Levine, 11:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Jim Fenton, 11:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, John L, 11:16
- [ietf-dkim] RE: 3rd party signing, John L, 11:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Douglas Otis, 10:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] include, Douglas Otis, 09:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] include, Mark Delany, 09:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] include, Michael Thomas, 09:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., Hector Santos, 09:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, Michael Thomas, 09:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] include, Hector Santos, 09:23
- [ietf-dkim] RE: 3rd party signing, Bill.Oxley, 09:22
- [ietf-dkim] Re: 3rd party signing, John L, 09:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., John L, 08:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] include, Mark Delany, 08:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Dave Crocker, 08:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] include, Michael Thomas, 08:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., william(at)elan.net, 08:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Arvel Hathcock, 08:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Hector Santos, 07:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., Hector Santos, 07:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., william(at)elan.net, 07:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found..., william(at)elan.net, 07:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., Scott Kitterman, 06:34
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Bill.Oxley, 06:18
- [ietf-dkim] 3rd party signing, Bill.Oxley, 06:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 05:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 05:36
- [ietf-dkim] Requirements on how SSP stuff is found..., Stephen Farrell, 03:48
- [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published..., Stephen Farrell, 03:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., Stephen Farrell, 03:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Jon Callas, 00:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hector Santos, 00:14
July 27, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., Hector Santos, 23:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Hector Santos, 23:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP complications, wa The URL to my paper ..., John Levine, 21:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Jim Fenton, 21:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, John Levine, 21:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 20:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Douglas Otis, 20:37
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Bill.Oxley, 19:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 19:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Douglas Otis, 18:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Hector Santos, 18:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Paul Hoffman, 17:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Jim Fenton, 17:31
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Bill.Oxley, 17:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Jon Callas, 17:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Michael Thomas, 16:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Jim Fenton, 16:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Jim Fenton, 16:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Jim Fenton, 16:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Douglas Otis, 16:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Hector Santos, 16:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Arvel Hathcock, 16:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 16:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Jim Fenton, 15:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Jon Callas, 15:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Michael Thomas, 15:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Jon Callas, 15:32
- RE: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 15:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Michael Thomas, 15:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Douglas Otis, 14:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 14:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Dave Crocker, 13:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Dave Crocker, 13:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Paul Hoffman, 13:13
- RE: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Paul Hoffman, 13:09
- RE: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Michael Thomas, 12:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, wayne, 12:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Douglas Otis, 12:55
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Steve Atkins, 12:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Michael Thomas, 12:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, wayne, 12:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 12:11
- [ietf-dkim] I sign nothing / only only 3rd party / some mail, Paul Hoffman, 11:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Douglas Otis, 11:32
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Bill.Oxley, 11:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Douglas Otis, 11:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Stephen Farrell, 10:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, wayne, 10:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Douglas Otis, 10:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 09:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains, Dave Crocker, 06:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP, Dave Crocker, 06:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains, Dave Crocker, 05:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Hector Santos, 02:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Mark Delany, 02:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Arvel Hathcock, 01:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Arvel Hathcock, 01:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Arvel Hathcock, 01:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Arvel Hathcock, 00:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Arvel Hathcock, 00:49
July 26, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains, John Levine, 23:35
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Hector Santos, 18:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Douglas Otis, 18:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Scott Kitterman, 18:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Mark Delany, 18:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Michael Thomas, 17:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Douglas Otis, 17:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Michael Thomas, 17:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Michael Thomas, 17:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Douglas Otis, 17:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Steve Atkins, 17:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains, Douglas Otis, 17:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Steve Atkins, 16:47
- [ietf-dkim] I send nothing, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Bill.Oxley, 16:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Scott Kitterman, 14:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hector Santos, 14:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains, J.D. Falk, 14:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains, Michael Thomas, 13:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 13:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Michael Thomas, 13:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Designated Signing Domains and Don't Sign assertions, Douglas Otis, 13:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Steve Atkins, 13:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP, Hector Santos, 13:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Stephen Farrell, 13:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Stephen Farrell, 13:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hector Santos, 13:25
- Re: MX 0 . (was Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options), Scott Kitterman, 13:20
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:10
- Re: MX 0 . (was Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options), william(at)elan.net, 13:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains, Mark Delany, 12:59
- MX 0 . (was Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options), Scott Kitterman, 12:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Steve Atkins, 12:39
- RE: [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains, Bill.Oxley, 12:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hector Santos, 12:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP, J.D. Falk, 12:22
- [ietf-dkim] domain (reputation) semantics: selectors vs. sub-domains, Dave Crocker, 12:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Douglas Otis, 11:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirements, Scott Kitterman, 11:58
- [ietf-dkim] requirements, Michael Thomas, 11:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 09:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Dave Crocker, 09:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP, Douglas Otis, 09:06
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Bill.Oxley, 09:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Mark Delany, 09:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Scott Kitterman, 08:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Dave Crocker, 08:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Stephen Farrell, 08:42
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM base v=0.4 up and running, Arvel Hathcock, 08:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Status of -base after working-group last call, Michael Thomas, 08:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Status of -base after working-group last call, Dave Crocker, 08:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Status of -base after working-group last call, Arvel Hathcock, 08:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Arvel Hathcock, 08:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP, Arvel Hathcock, 07:52
- [ietf-dkim] How to proceed with SSP, DKIM Chair, 06:03
- [ietf-dkim] Status of -base after working-group last call, DKIM Chair, 05:41
July 25, 2006
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policyoptions, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policyoptions, Douglas Otis, 19:17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policyoptions, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:47
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, John Levine, 15:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method, Hector Santos, 13:17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method, Stephen Farrell, 09:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Michael Thomas, 09:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method, Hector Santos, 08:51
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Douglas Otis, 08:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method, Hector Santos, 00:42
July 24, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method, Mark Delany, 22:51
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Patrick Peterson, 22:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method, Hector Santos, 22:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method, Mark Delany, 20:41
- [ietf-dkim] Eat all CR/LF - STRIP Canonicalization Method, Hector Santos, 19:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Hector Santos, 16:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Document Action: 'Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)' to Informational RFC, Stephen Farrell, 15:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Document Action: 'Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)' to Informational RFC, Dave Crocker, 15:13
- [ietf-dkim] Document Action: 'Analysis of Threats Motivating DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)' to Informational RFC, The IESG, 13:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, John Levine, 11:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, ned+dkim, 08:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Hector Santos, 08:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Hector Santos, 08:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Stephen Farrell, 08:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Eliot Lear, 07:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Douglas Otis, 07:46
- RE: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Bill.Oxley, 06:19
July 23, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, ned+dkim, 12:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Eliot Lear, 10:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, John Levine, 09:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Dave Crocker, 08:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, ned+dkim, 07:55
July 21, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //Security Concerns beyond Zone delegation, Douglas Otis, 16:01
- [ietf-dkim] Base-04 // ABNF cruft & errors, Douglas Otis, 12:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed Body Canon, Hector Santos, 09:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed Body Canon, Michael Thomas, 09:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed Body Canon, Tony Hansen, 09:07
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Relaxed Body Canon, John L, 09:03
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Relaxed Body Canon, Michael Thomas, 09:02
- [ietf-dkim] Relaxed Body Canon, Michael Thomas, 08:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bare CR and 822/2822 or just 2822, John Levine, 08:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Michael Thomas, 06:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Eliot Lear, 00:59
July 20, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Dave Crocker, 23:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Eliot Lear, 23:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //deprecated cryptographic algorithms, Stephen Farrell, 22:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Mark Delany, 21:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Michael Thomas, 20:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Mark Delany, 19:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //deprecated cryptographic algorithms, Tony Hansen, 19:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Michael Thomas, 19:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, John L, 18:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //deprecated cryptographic algorithms, Douglas Otis, 18:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Michael Thomas, 17:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //deprecated cryptographic algorithms, stephen . farrell, 17:19
- [ietf-dkim] Base-04 //deprecated cryptographic algorithms, Douglas Otis, 17:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Dave Crocker, 16:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, John Levine, 14:55
- [ietf-dkim] Base-04 // Semantics of Multiple Signatures, Douglas Otis, 14:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Douglas Otis, 13:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Dave Crocker, 12:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Dave Crocker, 12:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Mark Delany, 11:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Barry Leiba, 11:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Dave Crocker, 11:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Barry Leiba, 11:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Scott Kitterman, 11:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Paul Hoffman, 10:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Douglas Otis, 10:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 09:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Eliot Lear, 09:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Dave Crocker, 09:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Douglas Otis, 08:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822, Barry Leiba, 08:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Barry Leiba, 07:59
July 19, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822 was - Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Scott Kitterman, 22:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Douglas Otis, 22:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag, Mark Delany, 20:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag, Tony Hansen, 20:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag, Douglas Otis, 19:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, John L, 18:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag, Paul Hoffman, 17:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag, Michael Thomas, 17:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag, Douglas Otis, 16:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Paul Hoffman, 16:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Douglas Otis, 16:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag, Michael Thomas, 15:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag, Douglas Otis, 15:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, ned+dkim, 14:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag, Michael Thomas, 13:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, John Levine, 13:42
- [ietf-dkim] base-04 //inverting key t= 's'ub-domain flag, Douglas Otis, 13:20
- [ietf-dkim] base WGLC reminder - Friday, stephen . farrell, 11:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Michael Thomas, 10:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Paul Hoffman, 10:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Douglas Otis, 09:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Tony Hansen, 09:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Michael Thomas, 09:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Mark Delany, 08:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Tony Hansen, 08:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Michael Thomas, 07:38
July 18, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Internationalized domain names, Paul Hoffman, 17:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?, Sandy Wills, 11:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?, Dave Crocker, 11:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?, Paul Hoffman, 11:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?, Dave Crocker, 09:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?, Tony Hansen, 05:00
July 17, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?, Barry Leiba, 20:48
- [ietf-dkim] Which tags are required?, Paul Hoffman, 17:35
- {Blocked Content} [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-base-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 12:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing, Jim Fenton, 11:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, ned+dkim, 08:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing, SM, 08:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, ned+dkim, 08:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 08:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with bodycanonicalization, Hector Santos, 01:17
July 16, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with bodycanonicalization, Hector Santos, 23:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, Mark Delany, 23:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, Mark Delany, 23:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, John L, 22:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 21:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, John L, 21:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 21:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, John Levine, 17:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 submitted, Tony Hansen, 17:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 submitted, Stephen Farrell, 14:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 submitted, Paul Hoffman, 14:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 submitted, Scott Kitterman, 13:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing, Eliot Lear, 02:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing, Eliot Lear, 02:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing, Eliot Lear, 02:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing, Graham Murray, 02:20
July 15, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing, Mark Delany, 12:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing, Dave Crocker, 12:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing, Paul Hoffman, 12:41
- [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing, Stephen Farrell, 12:06
- [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-base-04 submitted, Eric Allman, 08:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 03:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Hector Santos, 01:59
July 14, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, ned+dkim, 21:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Hector Santos, 21:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Hector Santos, 20:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Mark Delany, 19:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, ned+dkim, 18:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 18:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 18:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Mark Delany, 17:52
- [ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 16:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing, Scott Kitterman, 13:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Arvel Hathcock, 13:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing, Arvel Hathcock, 12:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other"originator" headers?, Damon, 05:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other"originator" headers?, Hector Santos, 03:54
- [ietf-dkim] timing on base-04 draft, Eric Allman, 02:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Eric Allman, 02:11
July 13, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Scott Kitterman, 23:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Mark Delany, 22:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Tony Hansen, 21:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Douglas Otis, 21:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Scott Kitterman, 20:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Dave Crocker, 20:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, ned+dkim, 20:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Eric Allman, 17:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., wayne, 16:44
- [ietf-dkim] Final Call for Participation -- CEAS 2006, Dave Crocker, 16:17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?, Bill.Oxley, 15:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?, Tony Hansen, 15:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?, Scott Kitterman, 15:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Tony Hansen, 15:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?, Dave Crocker, 15:19
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?, Bill.Oxley, 15:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Eric Allman, 15:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?, Scott Kitterman, 15:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Jim Fenton, 14:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?, Hector Santos, 14:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Barry Leiba, 14:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Hector Santos, 14:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resent-* handling (was: Draft minutes...), Eric Allman, 14:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?, Barry Leiba, 14:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Barry Leiba, 13:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Scott Kitterman, 13:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Dave Crocker, 13:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Mark Delany, 13:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Douglas Otis, 13:21
- [ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other "originator" headers?, Eric Allman, 13:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Douglas Otis, 13:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Tony Hansen, 12:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] selectors, _policy._domainkey, Tony Hansen, 11:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Hector Santos, 11:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Tony Hansen, 11:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Tony Hansen, 11:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Sandy Wills, 10:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" bodycanonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Hector Santos, 10:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Tony Hansen, 10:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Hector Santos, 10:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Scott Kitterman, 08:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Michael Thomas, 08:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., william(at)elan.net, 08:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Mark Delany, 08:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Eric Allman, 07:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Tony Hansen, 07:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Sandy Wills, 07:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Dave Crocker, 07:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Eric Allman, 07:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] selectors, _policy._domainkey, Eric Allman, 07:05
- [ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Eric Allman, 07:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eliot Lear, 06:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Sandy Wills, 06:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] selectors, _policy._domainkey, Tony Hansen, 06:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Dave Crocker, 06:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Tony Hansen, 06:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eliot Lear, 05:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Dave Crocker, 05:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eric Allman, 05:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Dave Crocker, 05:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eliot Lear, 05:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] selectors, _policy._domainkey, Eric Allman, 04:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Dave Crocker, 04:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Eric Allman, 04:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eric Allman, 04:23
July 12, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Hector Santos, 22:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Hector Santos, 22:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Jim Fenton, 21:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Jim Fenton, 21:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Mark Delany, 21:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., william(at)elan.net, 20:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Dave Crocker, 20:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Douglas Otis, 20:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Tony Hansen, 20:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Mark Delany, 19:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Michael Thomas, 17:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Michael Thomas, 17:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Eric Allman, 17:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Eric Allman, 17:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Michael Thomas, 17:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Michael Thomas, 16:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Eric Allman, 16:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Michael Thomas, 16:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Eric Allman, 16:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Eric Allman, 16:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing, Michael Thomas, 14:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Dave Crocker, 14:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIIM WG - quck summary for saag, Mark Delany, 14:02
- [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., stephen . farrell, 13:25
- [ietf-dkim] DKIIM WG - quck summary for saag, stephen . farrell, 13:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing, Douglas Otis, 13:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eric Allman, 12:33
- [ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing, Michael Thomas, 12:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hector Santos, 11:51
- [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Dave Crocker, 11:12
- [ietf-dkim] selectors, _policy._domainkey, Tony Hansen, 11:03
- [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: NAKED CR & LF issues with body canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 08:36
- RE: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Bill.Oxley, 06:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, EKR, 05:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] plain-text and g=, Eric Allman, 05:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eric Allman, 05:33
July 11, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft text for specify IANA instructions, Tony Hansen, 15:54
- [ietf-dkim] plain-text and g=, Tony Hansen, 15:41
- [ietf-dkim] draft text for specify IANA instructions, Dave Crocker, 14:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, EKR, 13:51
- [ietf-dkim] draft text for specify IANA instructions, Dave Crocker, 13:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eliot Lear, 13:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Douglas Otis, 13:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, EKR, 12:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, Eliot Lear, 12:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Hector Santos, 11:21
- [ietf-dkim] review of draft-ietf-dkim-overview-01, EKR, 10:53
July 10, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Steve Atkins, 13:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Michael Thomas, 13:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Barry Leiba, 13:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Dave Crocker, 13:25
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Bill.Oxley, 13:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Eliot Lear, 13:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Dave Crocker, 12:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Michael Thomas, 11:07
- [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: DKIM - ROOM CHANGE], stephen . farrell, 06:25
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Bill.Oxley, 06:05
July 09, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Douglas Otis, 19:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Dave Crocker, 18:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Eric Allman, 17:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consistency among keys using q= alternatives, Eric Allman, 17:37
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Bill.Oxley, 17:09
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Jim Fenton \(fenton\), 12:34
- [ietf-dkim] Comments on -overview document?, Dave Crocker, 11:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Dave Crocker, 10:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Mark Delany, 07:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Stephen Farrell, 01:31
July 08, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dots in selectors, Tony Hansen, 20:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Tony Hansen, 20:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Douglas Otis, 07:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Stephen Farrell, 04:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Stephen Farrell, 03:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell, 03:47
July 07, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Jim Fenton, 17:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Mark Delany, 17:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dots in selectors, Douglas Otis, 17:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dots in selectors, Eric Allman, 17:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dots in selectors, Mark Delany, 16:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Eric Allman, 16:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Eric Rescorla, 16:18
- [ietf-dkim] dots in selectors, Eric Allman, 16:08
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Douglas Otis, 15:26
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Douglas Otis, 14:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell, 14:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] new issue: more details of key record format in base, Eric Allman, 14:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Eric Allman, 14:13
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Eliot Lear, 14:08
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Hector Santos, 14:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Eric Allman, 13:29
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Stephen Farrell, 12:04
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Douglas Otis, 10:59
July 06, 2006
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Eliot Lear, 19:24
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Douglas Otis, 10:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Douglas Otis, 09:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Dave Crocker, 04:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Paul Hoffman, 04:24
July 05, 2006
- [ietf-dkim] Working-Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dkim-base-03, Barry Leiba, 22:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] IANA considerations..., Tony Hansen, 22:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, John Levine, 21:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Mark Delany, 20:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, David Mayne, 20:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, John Levine, 19:11
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Stephen Farrell, 18:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, David Mayne, 18:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Douglas Otis, 18:30
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Paul Hoffman, 18:28
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Douglas Otis, 18:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Dave Crocker, 17:29
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Stephen Farrell, 16:51
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Douglas Otis, 16:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Paul Hoffman, 15:20
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Paul Hoffman, 15:12
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Jim Fenton, 15:02
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Paul Hoffman, 14:42
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP, Douglas Otis, 14:32
- [ietf-dkim] jabber, Stephen Farrell, 14:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Jim Fenton, 13:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Mark Delany, 13:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Steve Atkins, 13:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Michael Thomas, 13:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, John Levine, 13:13
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Douglas Otis, 12:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's + multiple selector labels, Douglas Otis, 12:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Eliot Lear, 11:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Steve Atkins, 09:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Mark Delany, 09:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Mark Delany, 09:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Michael Thomas, 08:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Michael Thomas, 08:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Mark Delany, 01:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Peter Koch, 01:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Mark Delany, 00:59
July 04, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Jim Fenton, 22:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: CNAME's, Eliot Lear, 22:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: CNAME's, Eliot Lear, 22:33
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Jim Fenton, 22:26
- [ietf-dkim] Re: CNAME's, John L, 13:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, John Levine, 12:02
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Michael Thomas, 09:37
- [ietf-dkim] CNAME's, Michael Thomas, 09:29
- Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Stephen Farrell, 09:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, John Levine, 09:18
- Reference to ID-AUTH-RES (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Paul Hoffman, 09:07
- [ietf-dkim] new issue: more details of key record format in base, Stephen Farrell, 09:06
- DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits), Paul Hoffman, 09:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell, 08:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Eric Rescorla, 08:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Peter Koch, 08:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell, 08:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell, 08:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Eric Rescorla, 07:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Michael Thomas, 07:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] section 5 rewrite?, Stephen Farrell, 05:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell, 02:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell, 02:50
July 03, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Eliot Lear, 23:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Jim Fenton, 23:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Tony Hansen, 20:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-03 key-*-tag minor issues, Eric Allman, 18:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] section 5 rewrite?, Eric Allman, 18:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Eric Allman, 18:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Mark Delany, 07:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Peter Koch, 00:38
July 02, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;, Stephen Farrell, 14:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;, Mark Delany, 12:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;, Stephen Farrell, 11:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Michael Thomas, 10:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;, Michael Thomas, 09:58
- [ietf-dkim] Re: bh=; l=0;, Paul Hoffman, 09:50
- [ietf-dkim] Re: bh=; l=0;, Michael Thomas, 08:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;, Stephen Farrell, 07:59
- [ietf-dkim] Re: bh=; l=0;, Paul Hoffman, 07:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?, Stephen Farrell, 07:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?, Michael Thomas, 07:45
- [ietf-dkim] bh=; l=0;, Michael Thomas, 07:26
- [ietf-dkim] dkim-base-03 key-*-tag minor issues, SUZUKI Takahiko, 00:35
July 01, 2006
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Paul Hoffman, 19:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Paul Hoffman, 19:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] section 5 rewrite?, Paul Hoffman, 19:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] IANA considerations..., Paul Hoffman, 19:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?, Paul Hoffman, 19:08
- [ietf-dkim] IANA considerations..., Stephen Farrell, 15:44
- [ietf-dkim] section 5 rewrite?, Stephen Farrell, 15:39
- [ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?, Stephen Farrell, 15:38
- [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits, Stephen Farrell, 15:37
- [ietf-dkim] Misc. fairly minor issues, Stephen Farrell, 15:31
- [ietf-dkim] "adjunct" DKIM web page updated, Dave Crocker, 06:43