Eric Allman wrote:
For the same reason From: has to be signed --- they represent the
[fill in blank with your favorite word: author, originator, whatever]
of the message. I suppose we can legitimately ask why From: MUST be
signed though. In terms of interoperability it is not required, but
in terms of being useful it seems like it is.
I'm unclear on Resent-From and Resent-Sender: can they be added in
transit?
If so, the MUST as worded below will guarantee the signature won't be
valid
after somebody adds those headers.
I guess if you're going to make these MUST requirements why Sender or
ListID aren't MUST's too. Frankly I think the wording with From, Subject
and Date is fine and leave the rest to the disgression of the signer.
Mike
eric
--On July 12, 2006 4:36:41 PM -0700 Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Eric Allman wrote:
> section 3.6.2, Resent-From, and Resent-Sender MUST also be
included.
Why MUST these be signed?
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html