Dave Crocker wrote:
I think your language describes things quite nicely.
I am pretty sure that DKIM does not have anything that cares about 822 vs.
2822.
That is, it works for both.
So I have tended to view the dual-reference approach as a means of
communicating
to folks that they do not have to worry about old-vs-new specifications for
message syntax/semantics.
I agree but perhaps we need to be a bit more explicit about exactly what
you say above, Dave.
Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html