To be clear:
Tony Hansen wrote:
In this paragraph, the term "deprecated" should be changed to "obsolete"
to be consistent.
+1
I've no problem with that editorial nit being raised, accepted or
rejected. I do have a problem Doug's saying yet again:
>> Currently DKIM lacks a defined mechanism to differentiate
>> "deprecated" algorithms. [...etc...]
That has been dealt with ad nauseum.
S.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html