ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Yahoo's domainkeys as historic: timing

2006-07-17 11:21:03
Stephen Farrell wrote:
The question: is it better for this document to be published as an
historic RFC "now" or at the same time as the standards track DKIM
base RFC is published? (Where all timings here are modulo the RFC
editor's queuing discipline.)
"same time", except that if the publication of DK is delayed for any
reason (e.g., editorial stuff, or queuing priorities), publication of
DKIM -base should not be delayed.  If they're published at the same
time, then sure, give DK the lower RFC number.

I presume the RFC Index will list DK as obsoleted by [DKIM RFC number]?

-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html