Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> writes:
What is the reason for Historic, rather than Informational?
I am prety sure that historic has never been applied to a specification that
was
not previously an IETF standard. The usual means of labeling an RFC that
specifies a popular, proprietary protocol is Informational.
Maybe because the aim is that DKIM will obsolete DomainKeys with the
hope that implementations currently experimenting with DomainKeys will
'upgrade' to using DKIM.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html