Jim Fenton wrote:
How does that differ from a sender that doesn't have the
"I sign some mail" flag set?
Yes, exactly.
Might the SSP record that says "I sign some mail", which could have a
long TTL, be more effectively cached by DNS than the (negative) caching
when there's no record?
how does a "i sign some mail" help?
If a message is signed, it either validates or it doesn't.
If a message is not signed, then how does a "some mail" ssp flag help?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html