Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements on where/how SSP stuff is published...

Dave Crocker wrote:
> Jim Fenton wrote:
>   
> > Stephen Farrell wrote:
> > I'll throw out a few generic requirements:
> >     
> Jim, these all look pretty reasonable, but they are all about the mechanism
> rather than being about sender signing practices, per se.
>   
Sure.  I was responding to Stephen's question about where/how SSP stuff
is published.  I wasn't trying to address what the SSP consists of.

-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html