A recipient will then have a valid party to complain to which is better
than blocking a domain that has been spoofed.
Thanks,
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc.
Alpharetta GA
404-847-6397
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: John Levine [mailto:johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 12:17 AM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Cc: Oxley, Bill (CCI-Atlanta)
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy
options
As an example, an ISP that has 10k business customers who potentially
will want signed mail a Commercial.isp.com signing domain would
assert I only sign 3rd party
It may well be true that you only sign third party mail, but I still
don't understand what use a recipient might make of that information.
If they get unwanted mail from someone and you've signed it, they'll
complain to you regardless.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html