Steve Atkins wrote:
If a sender asserts that all mail is signed, and you receive mail
purporting to be from that sender that isn't signed, are you
suggesting that it should be delivered anyway? If so, what's the
point of the sender asserting that all legitimate mail from them is
signed?
I think that a guiding principle that has served us well here is that
decisions
about what to do with the information provided to the receiver is strictly
up to the local policy of the receiver. Phrasing this as an information
service
rather than the signer trying tell a receiver what to do seems like a
much more
likely path to success to me.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html