On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:38:30AM -0700, Dave Crocker allegedly wrote:
Mark Delany wrote:
I guess I had been making the assumption that an SSP query is only
necessary on a verification failure. Some of the conversations seem to
suggest that an SSP query will be needed regardless of the success of
the verify. Is that the case at all? The uncommon case? The common
case?
Mark,
This came up during the Montreal meeting. I, too, had been assuming a nicely
symmetric distinction that used dkim-base for signed message and dkim-ssp for
unsigned ones.
Alas, it was pointed out to me that SSP does indeed have a requirement for a
I thought the requirements have yet to be determined?
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html