On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:28:12AM -0400, Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
allegedly wrote:
How about checking SSP first to see if they sign at all :-)?
For this conversation I'm treating an unsigned message the same as a
verification failure.
In that light, are you refering to an SSP query when no signature
is found in the email, or prior to even trying to verify?
Mark.
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc.
Alpharetta GA
404-847-6397
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Mark Delany
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 11:17 AM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a
successfulverify?
I guess I had been making the assumption that an SSP query is only
necessary on a verification failure. Some of the conversations seem to
suggest that an SSP query will be needed regardless of the success of
the verify. Is that the case at all? The uncommon case? The common
case?
Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html