So here's the main SSP axiom that I think should be self-evident, but
apparently isn't: other than the trivial (but useful) case of I send no
mail, the most that SSP can tell you is that a signature is missing.
I take it then that you see distinguishing between first party and third
party signatures as either being of no value or not being feasible?
I don't see the phrases "first party" or "third party" in there,
either explictly or otherwise.
R's,
John
PS: The SSP fog just keeps getting thicker.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html