ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Relaxed Body Canon

2006-07-21 09:07:13
What kinds of failures have you been seeing? Any thoughts on making
relaxed better?

        Tony

Michael Thomas wrote:
John Levine wrote:

down the line, be sure it's perfectly 2822 conformant and use a relaxed
signature.
 

So we've been running relaxed body canonicalization on one of our 
production servers, and I can't say that I've seen any evidence that
it is any better than simple.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html