John L wrote:
down the line, be sure it's perfectly 2822 conformant and use a relaxed
signature.
So we've been running relaxed body canonicalization on one of our
production
servers, and I can't say that I've seen any evidence that it is any
better than simple.
So I guess the smashed CR's aren't a problem, are they?
Huh? Relaxed body canonicalization doesn't do anything different with
CR's than simple.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html