On Jul 7, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Eric Allman wrote:
Thanks Mark. I made the change as you suggest, but left the "...
in a manner similar to the conventional use in domain names" part,
since that seems to me to impart an intuitive sense of what is
going on. Others may disagree....
Good thought about capitalization. I've made that change.
eric
--On July 7, 2006 11:35:44 PM +0000 Mark Delany <MarkD+dkim(_at_)yahoo-
inc.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 04:01:12PM -0700, Eric Allman allegedly
wrote:
In an attempt to clarify selectors and their interaction with DNS,
I've made the following changes to the draft:
Simplification suggestion:
Section 3.1, paragraph 3 now reads:
Periods are allowed in selectors and are component
separators. If keys are stored in DNS, the period defines
DNS
When keys are retreived from the DNS, periods
in selectors define DNS label boundaries. Selector components
might be used to combine...
Editorial nit. Since the term "selector" has special meaning in
the DKIM context, should it be capitalized as a noun?
This looks good. It gets confusing when the term selector is used
interchangeably with tag on the reflector. Making selector
capitalized could help.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html