Paul Hoffman wrote:
"If any tag listed as 'required' in Section 3.5 is missing from the
DKIM-Signature header field, the verifier [...]."
I would prefer "Unless every tag listed here is included in..."
That casts the language as a negative (or exceptional, or the like.) Humans do
a better job of comprehendingaffirmative forms better that exceptional,
exclusionary, or negative forms.
And I really would prefer the list be here, not manually culled from 3.5
by each reader of the spec.
+1.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html