Barry Leiba wrote:
While we're here, I'll point out something I missed until Paul set this
sentence out separately: the sentence's negative is done badly, leaving
it open to misinterpretation (it looks like it means "if NONE of them
are there"). I think this works better:
"If any tag listed as 'required' in Section 3.5 is missing from the
DKIM-Signature header field, the verifier [...]."
"Omitted" might be better than "missing"; I'm not sure.
+1 to the concern and the approach to alternate wording.
Perhaps:
If the DKIM-Signature header field does not contain one or more of the tags
listed as 'required' in Section 3.5, then the verifier [...]
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html