their zones. In any event, this seems like an argument against CNAME
support yet you then go on to say CNAMEs should be treated as
normal. I guess I'm confused as to the point?
Hey, I'm a liberal, I argue against myself.
a) there are some potentially interesting ways to use CNAMEs to manage
DKIM keys.
b) every DNS implementation on the planet already has CNAME support
that's invisible to clients like us, we're not going to change that,
so don't worry about it.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html