> Dave suggested in Montréal, to the agreement of at least some
> (including the chairs), that we have to step back and sort out SSP
> *requirements* before we can do an SSP specification.
I am in full agreement with this plan and am happy to see that an
approach is being managed and is well thought out. You're right, what
SSP ends up looking like is anyone's guess at this point but with a
pre-determined requirements doc to work from it will help the process
greatly.
--
Arvel
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html