ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options

2006-07-26 08:10:50
> Let's finish the DKIM signature spec, then see if we can agree to get
> out the smallest version of SSP on which we can get reasonable
> agreement (probably two bits, one for signs everything, the other for
> sends no mail), then we can return to the grand plans.

+1

The more I ponder this topic the more I'm inclined to believe that the flags "I sign everything" and "I don't send mail" are the base concerns that DKIM SSP must address. I'm optimistic that, if one isn't fundamentally opposed to the entire SSP concept from the outset, we should be able to reach a consensus that this basic functionality is central to an SSP system that can do anything useful at all.

I think we've got a winner here -- and deliverable within a reasonable time frame -- if we can keep the core requirements to a minimum.

--
Arvel



_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>