Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes...

2006-07-13 13:58:45

EVERYONE, PAY ATTENTION TO THIS!

Please STOP using this subject line.

If you have an issue to discuss, please create a new subject thatdescribes the issue you are discussing.


DO NOT USE THIS SUBJECT LINE!

--
Barry Leiba, DKIM working group chair  (leiba(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com)

_______________________________________________

NOTE WELL: This list operates according tohttp://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Sandy Wills Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Eric Allman Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Sandy Wills Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Sandy Wills Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., william(at)elan.net Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Tony Hansen Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Tony Hansen Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Barry Leiba <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Scott Kitterman
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: which headers should we REQUIRE to be signed?, Barry Leiba
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft minutes..., Douglas Otis
Next by Thread:	[ietf-dkim] Possible problem with "simple" body canonicalization -- trailing CRLFs, Eric Allman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]