Mark Delany wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:59:19AM -0400, Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
allegedly wrote:
You believe both and apply a receiver policy determined by yourself that
will handle a message with an anomaly,
I'm with John on this. I don't see any merit in constructing a system
that allows anomalies soley for the purpose of giving a receiver less
certainty and more work to do.
+1
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html