The query mechanism could certainly point to an alternate retrieval
mechanism such as http for long policy statements.
Thanks,
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc.
Alpharetta GA
404-847-6397
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 12:13 PM
To: Stephen Farrell
Cc: ietf-dkim
Subject: Re: DKIM TTPs (was Re: [ietf-dkim] editorials and nits)
Stephen Farrell wrote:
For DKIM, the DNS is a TTP.
Unless keys are queried through a different mechanism?
(Given the desire to allow extensibility in the choice of query
mechanisms, it
is worth being very clear about this.)
The DNS name *registration* mechanism is inherently essential to DKIM.
The DNS name *query* mechanism is certainly going to be essential to
initial
operation, but is it an inherent requirement long-term?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html