Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 9:57 AM -0700 7/20/06, Douglas Otis wrote:
A follow-on:
-1. We should not be thinking about changing IDNA or RFC 2822 in the
DKIM WG.
Paul, I think you are being entirely too rigid in your views.
There is nothing wrong with having a working group take on extra tasks, very
late in its basic work, that are a) entirely outside the scope of its charter,
and b) likely to de-stabilize that basic work...
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html