ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822

2006-07-23 10:32:27
Ned Freed wrote:
But if it is done by the MUA, the problem is that fully comformant SUBMIT
agents or various sorts of other conforming intermediaries can and often will
wreck the signature. And this says nothing about non-conforming 
intermediaries,
which aren't exactly unheard of.

If you want another example, how about RFC 4141? You're a coauthor of that 
one.

      

Even fully compliant 2822 messages going in can have content tagged
going out.

Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html