From: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
Now that sounds *very* complicated, or else, very marginal
(in terms of places it could be used).
A bank? Maybe with the growing "e-Medical" market, a doctor? or in general
any high-value domain who will most likely have a Donald Trump "HUGE"
expectation for direct 1 to 1 like exclusivity with no middle ware
tampering.
I am not sure if you (speaking in general of course <g>) is questioning the
value of this or whether its possible to work or simply no one will want to
use it.
There is harm there - we'd at least be creating a new
DoS opportunity where none would exist otherwise, and
that I definitely dislike.
How would this Exclusive (I am the only one to sign) SSP policy DoS work and
if so, why would not there be a defense?
Or more general, where is the DoS where it would not be otherwise today? I
just don't see how we are not defensive minded on DoS across the board, but
for this one, we are?
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html