IETF DKIM (thread)
[ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life,
John L,
2006/08/29
- [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, John L, 2006/08/29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Hector Santos, 2006/08/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Steve Atkins, 2006/08/29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, John L, 2006/08/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, J.D. Falk, 2006/08/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, John Levine, 2006/08/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/31
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Hector Santos, 2006/08/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Hector Santos, 2006/08/31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/30
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/30
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/30
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/30
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/30
[ietf-dkim] Itemized Summary of SSP Requirements-00,
Hector Santos,
2006/08/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Itemized Summary of SSP Requirements-00, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Itemized Summary of SSP Requirements-00, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Itemized Summary of SSP Requirements-00, Hector Santos, 2006/08/29
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Itemized Summary of SSP Requirements-00, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/29
[ietf-dkim] Responsibility concerns with Designated Signing Domains,
Jim Fenton,
2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Responsibility concerns with Designated Signing Domains, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Responsibility concerns with Designated Signing Domains, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/25
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with Designated Signing Domains, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/26
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Hector Santos, 2006/08/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigningDomains, Hector Santos, 2006/08/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigningDomains, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigningDomains, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concernswith DesignatedSigningDomains, Hector Santos, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns withDesignatedSigningDomains, Hector Santos, 2006/08/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns withDesignatedSigningDomains, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns withDesignatedSigningDomains, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/27
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibilityconcerns withDesignatedSigningDomains, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, John Levine, 2006/08/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigningDomains, Hector Santos, 2006/08/27
- Message not available
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Damon, 2006/08/27
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Hector Santos, 2006/08/27
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigningDomains, Hector Santos, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigningDomains, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigningDomains, Hector Santos, 2006/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/28
- [ietf-dkim] Reputation trusted layers is out of scope, Hector Santos, 2006/08/28
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Reputation trusted layers is out of scope, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reputation trusted layers is out of scope, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reputation trusted layers is out of scope, Hector Santos, 2006/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Damon, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/28
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/28
- Message not available
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/29
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/30
- [ietf-dkim] base state (was: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains), Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Hector Santos, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Damon, 2006/08/28
- [ietf-dkim] there is no such thing as a valid dkim-base *message*, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] there is no such thing as a valid dkim-base *message*, Damon, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] there is no such thing as a valid dkim-base *message*, Damon, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] there is no such thing as a valid dkim-base *message*, Hector Santos, 2006/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Damon, 2006/08/27
- Message not available
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/26
- Message not available
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Responsibility concerns with DesignatedSigning Domains, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Responsibility concerns with Designated Signing Domains, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Responsibility concerns with Designated Signing Domains, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Responsibility concerns with Designated Signing Domains, J.D. Falk, 2006/08/25
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Responsibility concerns with Designated Signing Domains, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/26
[ietf-dkim] Scalability concerns with Designated Signing Domains,
Jim Fenton,
2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Scalability concerns with Designated Signing Domains, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Scalability concerns with Designated Signing Domains, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Scalability concerns with Designated Signing Domains, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/26
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Scalability concerns with Designated Signing Domains, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/30
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Scalability concerns with Designated Signing Domains, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/30
[ietf-dkim] Bayesian filters are the pits,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2006/08/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Bayesian filters are the pits, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Bayesian filters are the pits, J.D. Falk, 2006/08/22
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Bayesian filters are the pits, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Bayesian filters are the pits, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Bayesian filters are the pits, John Levine, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Bayesian filters are the pits, J.D. Falk, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Bayesian filters are the pits, Hector Santos, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Bayesian filters are the pits, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Bayesian filters are the pits, Hector Santos, 2006/08/25
- [ietf-dkim] Tshirt requests, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/24
Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision,
Scott Kitterman,
2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/25
[ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision,
Dave Crocker,
2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Damon, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Damon, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Damon, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Paul Hoffman, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Paul Hoffman, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/18
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Damon, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Paul Hoffman, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/21
- [ietf-dkim] SSP backward compatibility, Hector Santos, 2006/08/21
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/21
- [ietf-dkim] Keys vs. Reputation, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Keys vs. Reputation, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/21
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Keys vs. Reputation, Damon, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Keys vs. Reputation, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Keys vs. Reputation, Damon, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Keys vs. Reputation, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Keys vs. Reputation, J.D. Falk, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Keys vs. Reputation, Hector Santos, 2006/08/22
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Keys vs. Reputation, Damon, 2006/08/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/18
- Message not available
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of 2822.From policy, Damon, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Role of 2822.From policy, Hector Santos, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/17
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/18
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/18
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Damon, 2006/08/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Graham Murray, 2006/08/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/22
- [ietf-dkim] Where to look for the signing practice, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Where to look for the signing practice, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Where to look for the signing practice, Hector Santos, 2006/08/23
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/23
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Damon, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Damon, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Damon, 2006/08/24
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buydesigndecision, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Jon Callas, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Damon, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Jon Callas, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Damon, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Damon, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Jon Callas, 2006/08/24
- [ietf-dkim] Policy Lookup for Non-Signed Mail, Hector Santos, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buydesigndecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buydesigndecision, Damon, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Damon, 2006/08/24
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Hector Santos, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, John Levine, 2006/08/25
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy designdecision, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/18
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegating responsibility: a make vs. buy design decision, Wietse Venema, 2006/08/23
Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns,
Scott Kitterman,
2006/08/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/17
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/17
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Jim Fenton, 2006/08/17
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Hector Santos, 2006/08/17
- [ietf-dkim] Responsible SSP usage, Hector Santos, 2006/08/17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/19
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP Responsibility Delegation - Security Concerns, Hector Santos, 2006/08/18
[ietf-dkim] Clarification: Section 5.4.6,
Damon,
2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification: Section 5.4.6, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification: Section 5.4.6, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification: Section 5.4.6, Hector Santos, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification: Section 5.4.6, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification: Section 5.4.6, Hector Santos, 2006/08/09
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Clarification: Section 5.4.6, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarification: Section 5.4.6, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/10
[ietf-dkim] Requirements clarification/addition: DKIM Signing Complete should include designated third parties,
Scott Kitterman,
2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements clarification/addition: DKIM Signing Complete should include designated third parties, Damon, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements clarification/addition: DKIM Signing Complete should include designated third parties, Tony Hansen, 2006/08/09
- [ietf-dkim] RFC2822.Sender, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC2822.Sender, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC2822.Sender, Tony Hansen, 2006/08/09
- Identity selection related requirements (Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC2822.Sender), william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC2822.Sender, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/09
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC2822.Sender, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/10
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC2822.Sender, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC2822.Sender, Hector Santos, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC2822.Sender, Mark Delany, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements clarification/addition: DKIM Signing Complete should include designated third parties, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/09
[ietf-dkim] Requirements comment: Bigbank example description,
Scott Kitterman,
2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Tony Hansen, 2006/08/09
- [ietf-dkim] 2822.From or 2822.Sender and 2822.From was:Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/09
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/09
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/09
- [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st party valid signatures., Hector Santos, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st party valid signatures., Damon, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st party valid signatures., Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st party valid signatures., Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st party valid signatures., Damon, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st party valid signatures., Michael Thomas, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st partyvalid signatures., Hector Santos, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st partyvalid signatures., Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st party valid signatures., Hector Santos, 2006/08/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st partyvalid signatures., Wietse Venema, 2006/08/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st partyvalidsignatures., Hector Santos, 2006/08/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st partyvalidsignatures., Wietse Venema, 2006/08/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1stpartyvalidsignatures., Hector Santos, 2006/08/12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1stpartyvalidsignatures., Wietse Venema, 2006/08/12
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1stpartyvalid signatures., Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1stpartyvalid signatures., Hector Santos, 2006/08/11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Hector Santos, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Hector Santos, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Hector Santos, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Hector Santos, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/10
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/10
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/10
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/10
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/10
- [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Hector Santos, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description, Hector Santos, 2006/08/10
- [ietf-dkim] Lean vs. Fat 'requirements', Dave Crocker, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Lean vs. Fat 'requirements', Michael Thomas, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Lean vs. Fat 'requirements', Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Lean vs. Fat 'requirements', Steve Atkins, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Lean vs. Fat 'requirements', Hector Santos, 2006/08/10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Lean vs. Fat 'requirements', Jon Callas, 2006/08/10
[ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA,
Scott Kitterman,
2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, J.D. Falk, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, J.D. Falk, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, stephen . farrell, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/08
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/08
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Signalling DKIM support before DATA, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/08
[ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?,
Mark Delany,
2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Hector Santos, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Hector Santos, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Mark Delany, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Hector Santos, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Hector Santos, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Steve Atkins, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Steve Atkins, 2006/08/07
- [ietf-dkim] SSP False positives/negatives, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Damon, 2006/08/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Hector Santos, 2006/08/07
- Message not available
- [ietf-dkim] SSP is about obtaining 0% False Positives, Hector Santos, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/06
- [ietf-dkim] What are the security problems of DKIM-BASE worh addressing with policy Concepts?, Hector Santos, 2006/08/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Damon, 2006/08/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Damon, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Damon, 2006/08/07
- [ietf-dkim] remote access, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] remote access, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] remote access, Hector Santos, 2006/08/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] How to reconcile passive vs active?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/07
[ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy,
Michael Thomas,
2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Hector Santos, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Mark Delany, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, John Levine, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, John L, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Steve Atkins, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/05
- [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Mark Delany, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Mark Delany, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Hector Santos, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Hector Santos, 2006/08/05
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] List based policy, Hector Santos, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Mark Delany, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Hector Santos, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/06
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/06
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/06
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Hector Santos, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Damon, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Damon, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Damon, 2006/08/08
- [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Frank Ellermann, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Damon, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Damon, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Hector Santos, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "I sign everything" is not a useful policy, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/06
[ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/04
[ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?,
Stephen Farrell,
2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?, Hector Santos, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?, Hector Santos, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] All done on potential SSP requirements?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/04
[ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom,
John L,
2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L, 2006/08/03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Hector Santos, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Hector Santos, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Hector Santos, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John Levine, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Mark Delany, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Graham Murray, 2006/08/13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Steve Atkins, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Steve Atkins, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L, 2006/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John L, 2006/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Hector Santos, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Hector Santos, 2006/08/04
- Message not available
- [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment, John L, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment, John L, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, wayne, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/02
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/02
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/02
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/02
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Damon, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Hector Santos, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Mark Delany, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Mark Delany, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, John Levine, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, John L, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/04
- [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization, Hector Santos, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Mark Delany, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Hector Santos, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Hector Santos, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Hector Santos, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, John L, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Hector Santos, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/05
- [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy, John L, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy, John L, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy, Damon, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy, Jeff Macdonald, 2006/08/07
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The problem with sender policy, Jeff Macdonald, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Mark Delany, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Hector Santos, 2006/08/05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Hector Santos, 2006/08/08
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Damon, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Damon, 2006/08/07
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/05
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements, Damon, 2006/08/07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Hector Santos, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, John Levine, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Mark Delany, 2006/08/04
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Hector Santos, 2006/08/05
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A more fundamental SSP axiom, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/06
[ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible,
Hector Santos,
2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/01
- RE: [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest ProtectionPossible, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible, Hector Santos, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible, Hector Santos, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Requirements: SSP must offer Highest Protection Possible, william(at)elan.net, 2006/08/04
Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?,
Michael Thomas,
2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, John Levine, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Arvel Hathcock, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are verifiers expected to query SSP on a successful verify?, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/02
Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms,
Scott Kitterman,
2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Damon, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/01
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hector Santos, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hector Santos, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Damon, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Damon, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hector Santos, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Damon, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/01
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hector Santos, 2006/08/01
- RE: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Bill.Oxley, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, John Levine, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hector Santos, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hector Santos, 2006/08/02
- [ietf-dkim] WG and individual submissions..., Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] WG and individual submissions..., Tony Hansen, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hector Santos, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Damon, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Damon, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Stephen Farrell, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Damon, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hector Santos, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, John L, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Hector Santos, 2006/08/02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Dave Crocker, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, John Levine, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, John Levine, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, John Levine, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Michael Thomas, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms, Scott Kitterman, 2006/08/01