Re: [ietf-dkim] punting into near-term standardization

> So let's settle on the 1, 2 or 3 statements with a sufficiently broad
> and strong consensus to make it clear that we should standardize them,
> and be done with it (for now.)
>
> The two that I vote for are:

+1.  This is exactly what we should do in my view.  Also make the 
protocol extensible and we're pretty much done for the initial round.
--
Arvel


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html