What is out of line is one who is suppose be writing the design requirement
has suddenly decided that it probably isn't a good idea after all.
What's wrong with that picture? Ban me if you must, I will not lower my
standards, my ethics nor morals. Never.
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
Cc: <ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP requirements
Hector,
I missed this one earlier.
Hector Santos wrote:
My apology to the WG chairs, but this is utterly ridiculous position
coming
from a person who is suppose to write the SSP design requirements. It
reeks
badly with obvious signs of conflict of interest by specific individuals
to
kill SSP.
This is also out of line. You're accusing someone of bad faith (which
is totally out-of-line) and without even waiting to see the I-D (which
is ridiculously premature).
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html