John L wrote:
It may sound like I'm channelling Dave here, but I don't want to put
anything into a protocol that doesn't have a straightforward operational
value, and I don't think that "stir it into the mix in spamassassin" is
straightforward.
It ain't me. It's a long-standing pattern of what gets deployed and used.
So if there is any channeling, we are both doing it, on behalf of the God of
Successful Protocols...
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html