ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-00.txt available

2006-08-08 11:45:02
I like the acknowledgement section

Bill Oxley 
Messaging Engineer 
Cox Communications, Inc. 
Alpharetta GA 
404-847-6397 
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com 


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 1:46 PM
To: Michael Thomas
Cc: IETF-DKIM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-00.txt
available


I'd like to thank Mike for putting this together while the list
traffic was speeding by at such a rate.

When commenting on this, the usual approach applies of course,
in that its much better to suggest alternate text where you'd
like it to say something else. Try if you can to keep that at
the level of specific requirements, and e.g. don't send an
entire new I-D as you alternate text.

And it is still a good idea to avoid repeating oneself, (he
said yet again:-), which is another reason to prefer comments
supplying alternate text.

Thanks,
Stephen.

Michael Thomas wrote:
at:
http://mtcc.com/standards/draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-00.txt

until it shows up in the draft repository. Full disclaimer, this has
been
put together in a very small amount of time, sifting through a huge
amount
of mail on the list.

      Mike


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html