Hector Santos:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Delany" <MarkD+dkim(_at_)yahoo-inc(_dot_)com>
It obvious that there are two relatively strong viewpoints: one the
passive that Dave describes and one the active that, amongst others, I
describe.
...
Do we try and accommodate both? If so, how?
In my opinion, and I had asked the chair a week or so to consider this
approach:
I also proposed a straw vote on the fundamental question:
Do you believe there are security problems
directly or indirectly related to DKIM-BASE that are worth
solving or addressing using a Sender Signer Policy concept?
None. If a message is signed by example.com, then that signature
introduces no security vulnerability, even if the message originates
from some other, unrelated, domain.
Wietse
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html