Following myself up with a clarification:
Michael Thomas wrote:
"In particular, a Practice or Expectation MUST NOT mandate any
disposition stance on the receiver."
The reason that I've written it in this way was purposeful on my part: the
sender's expectation is that there should be a valid signature. I don't
really
think we need to go further than that because if a receiver knows that the
sender expects a message to arrive with a valid signature, that's really
all
it needs to know that there's something seriously amiss. What it actually
does when something is amiss it's its business, and I really don't think we
need to give helpful hints as it's not really rocket science at that
point,
and we really don't want to prejudice any particular action.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html