[ietf-dkim] Re: Clarification: Section 5.4.6

Hector Santos wrote:

> Protocol MUST allow for a informational text note for the
> policy.
I always hated the exp= explanations in SPF.  A "disclaimer"
n=convoluted_legalese isn't better, IMO receivers won't care
about it.  You'd also get I18N issues with such "disclaimers".

Frank


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html