On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Michael Thomas wrote:
Hector Santos wrote:
Even then, the main issue are the potential damages that are being
ignored.
My wife said it best when asked why even the BIG companies like WALMART,
YAHOO, CISCO, AOL.COM, BIGBANK should also support strong policies:
I can say with little hesitation that Cisco will never publish the
"strong" policy as envisioned by Mark for our user population. I
But what makes you think you should be the one to decide for everyone
what their policies is and if they should or should not be allowed to
publish strong policy?
The requirement for your document is clearly that not everyone is
the same and so that should be reflected in policy syntax allowing
for more choices then just "I sign all: yes/no". And BTW, DSAP has
this covered quite well with its multiple failure handling tags
so you can adjust policy to fit to your situation.
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html