ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment

2006-08-04 12:29:45
One would assume that an additional signing algorithm has been introduced and 
not using the TOM SWIFTY algorithm I would refer to base and treat your message 
as unsigned.
thanks,


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org on behalf of John L
Sent: Fri 8/4/2006 2:05 PM
To: DKIM List
Subject: [ietf-dkim] SSP thought experiment
 
a) "SIGN ALL MAIL" and "DO NOT USE ANY SERVICES KNOWN TO DAMAGE THEIR 
SIGNATURES"

b) "SIGN ALL MAIL"

I want to put "ALL MAIL HAS TOM SWIFTIES" in my SSP.

Assuming you agree that's ridiculous, what's the practical difference to 
people using SSP between that and b) above?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet 
for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html