On 8/29/06, Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> wrote:
The requirement that I believe that the delegation discussion highlights is the
need for controlled delegation.
I.E I delegate to Fred the ability to sign on behalf of
marketing(_at_)example(_dot_)com but not ceo(_at_)example(_dot_)com(_dot_)
+1
Are we going to specifically disallow fred the ability to sign for
ceo(_at_)example(_dot_)com by policy or say that fred can only sign for
marketing(_at_)example(_dot_)com?
Regards,
Damon Sauer
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html