I'm sorry, a correction to my question:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com>
The requirement that I believe that the delegation discussion
highlights is the need for controlled delegation.
I.E I delegate to Fred the ability to sign on behalf of
marketing(_at_)example(_dot_)com but not ceo(_at_)example(_dot_)com(_dot_)
The delegation example is relevant because it is only the
policy mechanism that creates the need to count a signature by
Fred as a domain signature for example.com.
Ok, but you think it will still work or its consistent with the discovery
requirements 5.1.1 and 5.3.1?
| 5.1.1 [_] MUST use DNS RR TXT for Policy record.
| 5.3.1 [_] MUST use 2822.From domain only.
Or is this a DNS record preparation issue?
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html