ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Requirements comment: Bigbank example description

2006-08-10 04:41:28

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
To: "william(at)elan.net" <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net>; 

Would you remind me how this would work with multiple 
address in the From field? [*]

What's wrong with checking each one?  I mean, why 
allow for a loophole?

William,

The question is:

     Is the whole the same as the sum of its parts?

Lets consider an example:

    From: A, B, C
    DKIM-Signature: d=A; h=From: ....

Should the result be the same when viewed as three separate messages?

    From: A
    DKIM-Signature: d=A; h=From: ....

    From: B
    DKIM-Signature: d=A; h=From: ....

    From: C
    DKIM-Signature: d=A; h=From: ....

Theoretically, the answer is yes. 

The expected outcome in all cases should be the same.


-- 
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com









_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>