----- Original Message -----
From: "Wietse Venema" <wietse(_at_)porcupine(_dot_)org>
To: <ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org>
I prefer the "must not be required" form. I know that it implies
"may perform SSP lookup", but the latter form can more easily be
lobbied into a stronger recommendation for SSP lookup, which is
definitely not what I want.
I am curious to know, from an engineering standpoint, why it is something
you definitely not want to see implemented? What am I missing here?
While I prefer the latter because I believe it is better design, it really
doesn't matter to me what it says or not since its an implementation issue.
May the better implementation win.
But if there is a fault in my proposal, I would seriously like to have the
feedback if you may. If I'm wrong, Great! Just like to know what's wrong
with doing SSP first as implied by requirements 2, 3, 4 and 7, but
inconsistent with requirement 9?
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html