On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:39:36 -0700 Jim Fenton <fenton(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
wrote:
... In addition to other objections I have, if it is not
significantly simpler I question the need for an additional mechanism,
especially in a security context such as this.
I think the real question is simpler for who. I think it makes sense for
operators to take on complexity is it simplifies thing for authors.
...
I have a list of other concerns, which I'll post separately. I started
with the security concern because it seemed the most clear-cut objection.
I look forward to it. I don't want to do it if it's dumb.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html