I went through the draft and marked it up. I'll break these up into
individual messages for each comment. I'll start with a context diff of the
draft and proposed changes and then give a discussion of why...
*** 321,328 ****
unsigned outweights the risk of illegitimate mail being delivered in
the eyes of the sender.
! 1. A purportedly sends to B with a missing or broken DKIM signature
! from A
2. B would like to know whether that is an acceptable state of
affairs.
--- 321,328 ----
unsigned outweights the risk of illegitimate mail being delivered in
the eyes of the sender.
! 1. Mail with a RFC2822.From A is sent to B with a missing or broken
! DKIM signature
2. B would like to know whether that is an acceptable state of
affairs.
***************
I think that saying mail with an RFC2822.From A is clearer than A purportedly
sends. Also, Purported is used in Sender ID PRA (Purported Responsible
Address) and so use of that word in this context might be confusing for some.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html