ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] The key record upgrade attack

2006-08-04 09:35:55
At 8:38 AM -0700 8/4/06, Douglas Otis wrote:
During a transition, it would be important to communicate what will be offered and what has been deprecated. Then these options MUST be available or the related signatures MUST be ignored.

The SSP document *cannot* change the way implementers of the -base document process signatures. "MUST be ignored" changes the logic of -base.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html