ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life

2006-08-31 11:18:42


Hector Santos wrote:
Since base has no normative reference to ssp then there is no
requirement to implement ssp for conformance with base.

Nothing to do with being a chair that - the lack of the
normative reference says it all (as a quick read of the document
should make clear).

At the risk of being in the wrong position here, you do have the tie in with
the TA document with pretty profound statements:

This is quite clear. Base does NOT REQUIRE SSP.

That doesn't stop anyone who implements a DKIM-verifier from using SSP
in as a enthusiastic manner as they like.

Stephen.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html