ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Delegated signatures in real life

2006-08-31 11:02:25

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>

This is quite clear. Base does NOT REQUIRE SSP.

No doubt. It is made quite clear.

That doesn't stop anyone who implements a DKIM-verifier from
using SSP in as a enthusiastic manner as they like.

Or more importantly, DKIM-SIGNERS who may also read the TA document in their
research to see "how safe this is" and see they might need something SSP.

--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com







_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html