2.8 I'm not sure suspicious is the right adjective here, perhaps
non-conforming/conforming might be a better terminology.
"I might be suspicious of a non-conforming signature."
Thanks,
Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc.
Alpharetta GA
bill(_dot_)oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:29 PM
To: IETF-DKIM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02.txt]
TXT and HTML versions are also available at
<http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-dkim.htm>.
d/
Jim Fenton wrote:
FYI, an updated version of the Allman/Delany/Fenton SSP draft is now
available. The changes from -01 are fairly extensive; see the summary
of changes near the end of the document.
-Jim
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : DKIM Sender Signing Practices
Author(s) : E. Allman, et al.
Filename : draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02.txt
Pages : 18
Date : 2006-8-31
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html