----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
And I further believe that the position as stated by Wietse
does represent the consensus of the WG, so I don't think we
should continue to argue the merits or otherwise of various
possibilities for DKIM-base signature semantics.
[Correction to my previous response]
Then are we going to change the DKIM-BASE document?
It is not a mistake to suggest there is a statement or
implication of the MUST has 2822.From mandate. Section 5.4
clearly goes into what headers should be considered for
specific reasons. There is a strong reason for that.
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html